據美國鉆井網站2021年5月19日報道，挪威著名能源研究和商業情報公司雷斯塔能源公司（Rystad）稱，英國石油公司（BP）和法國道達爾公司日前先后宣布了他們到2030年最大的可再生能源目標，并強調兩家公司的目標是50吉瓦的產能。
這個產能是同期其他石油巨頭的兩倍多，埃尼公司、殼牌公司、Equinor和雷普索爾公司的可再生能源產能目標都在20吉瓦以下，葡萄牙最大能源企業Galp的目標是10吉瓦，雪佛龍公司的目標遠低于5吉瓦。
Rystad可再生能源副總裁Vegard Wiik Vollset說：“如果我們把英國石油公司和道達爾公司2030年前50吉瓦的目標看成是他們可再生能源投資基準，這兩家公司在可再生能源達到他們目標前將不得不每年向新項目花費大約50億到60億美元?！?/p>
Vollset強調說，相比之下，英國石油公司到2030年在油氣項目上的計劃資本支出(CAPEX)為每年80億美元，道達爾公司到2030年在油氣項目上的計劃資本支出約為每年100億美元。
根據上面的數據，平均起來，英國石油公司的年度石油和天然氣支出將在37.5%，比其到2030年年度可再生能源支出高出25%，而道達爾公司的年度石油和天然氣支出將在50%，比其到2030年年度可再生能源支出高出40%。
展望2050年，Vollset概述了一個遠離化石燃料的巨大轉變。Rystad的代表告訴美國鉆井網站，即使將油氣的中游和下游部分包括在內，到2050年可再生能源的總投資預計將是油氣的10倍。Vollset強調，2020年全球在石油和天然氣項目上的支出超過了可再生項目。
Vollset說：“至于石油巨頭到2050年前將采取什么行動，我認為這取決于個別公司，你可以看到它們之間迥然不同的做法?！?/p>
Vollset補充說：“雖然歐洲石油巨頭已經在可再生能源領域進行了戰略轉移，但美國石油巨頭尚未在可再生能源領域進行任何實質性投資。”
惠譽解決方案公司資深油氣分析師Emma Richards指出，由于資本支出預測往往是短期的，石油巨頭2050年的潛在投資比例將會是怎樣的，這很難衡量。
Richards告訴美國鉆井網站：“凈零目標可以提供一個指導，但就可再生能源與石油和天然氣的支出而言，這意味著將取決于一系列因素，尤其是碳捕獲技術的部署和碳抵消的使用?！?/p>
Richards補充道：“總的來說，這一比例目前非常低，但對于那些從大型石油公司向大型能源公司轉型的大型企業來說，到2050年前，清潔能源可能會占據資本支出的最大份額?！?/p>
這位惠譽解決方案的分析師接著指出，美國石油巨頭在其投資組合中保留的石油和天然氣比重看來將高于歐洲同行。
李峻 編譯自 美國鉆井網站
原文如下：
The Renewables vs Oil Spend of Majors
BP and Total have the biggest announced renewables targets to 2030 among the oil and gas majors, according to Rystad Energy, which highlights that the companies are aiming for 50 gigawatts (GW) of capacity.
This is more than double that of any other major during the same period, with Eni, Shell, Equinor, and Repsol all targeting under 20 GW of renewables capacity, Galp aiming for 10 GW and Chevron aiming for well under five GW, Rystad outlines.
If we take BP and Total’s 50 GW target by 2030 as their renewables investment benchmark, the companies will have to spend roughly $5 billion to $6 billion per year on new projects within renewables to reach their targets, according to Vegard Wiik Vollset, Rystad Energy’s vice president of renewable energy.
In comparison, Vollset highlighted that BP’s planned capital expenditure (CAPEX) on oil and gas projects to 2030 is $8 billion per year and Total’s planned CAPEX on oil and gas projects to 2030 is around $10 billion per year. Going by the figures above, on average, BP’s annual oil and gas spend would be around 37.5 percent to 25 percent higher than its annual renewables spend to 2030 and Total’s annual oil and gas spend would be around 50 percent to 40 percent higher than its annual renewables investment during the same period.
Looking further ahead to 2050, Vollset outlined a drastic shift away from fossil fuels. The Rystad Energy representative told Rigzone that total investment in renewable energy in 2050 is expected to be ten times that of oil and gas, even if the midstream and downstream part of oil and gas is included. Vollset highlighted that, in 2020, the world spent more on oil and gas projects than on renewable projects.
“With regards to what the oil majors will be doing by then [2050], I think it depends on the individual company, as you see drastically different approaches between them,” Vollset said.
“Whereas the European majors have already made strategic shifts into renewables, the U.S. majors have yet to make any material investments within renewables energy,” Vollset added.
Commenting on what the potential percentage breakdown of investment among the majors may look like to 2050, Emma Richards, a senior oil and gas analyst at Fitch Solutions, noted that it would be hard to gauge as CAPEX projections tend to be short run.
“Net zero ambitions can offer a guide, but what this means in terms of spending on renewables versus oil and gas will depend on a host of factors, not least the deployment of carbon capture technologies and the use of carbon offsets,” Richards told Rigzone.
“In general, the percentage share is currently extremely low but, for those majors transitioning from big oil to big energy, clean energies will likely take the lion’s share of CAPEX by 2050,” Richards added.
The Fitch Solutions analyst went on to note that U.S. majors look set to retain oil and gas as a larger share of their portfolios than their European counterparts.
免責聲明：本網轉載自其它媒體的文章，目的在于弘揚石化精神，傳遞更多石化信息，并不代表本網贊同其觀點和對其真實性負責，在此我們謹向原作者和原媒體致以敬意。如果您認為本站文章侵犯了您的版權，請與我們聯系，我們將第一時間刪除。
